2026년 ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini: 33개 프롬프트, 3명의 승자
How we ran the test
We picked 33 real prompts drawn from common knowledge-worker workflows — coding, long-form writing, factual research, math/reasoning, structured data extraction, and multimodal tasks (image + text). Each prompt was submitted to all three models:
- GPT-4o (via ChatGPT Plus, $20/mo)
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via Claude Pro, $20/mo)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro with Search (via Gemini Advanced, $20/mo)
Three reviewers independently scored outputs 1-5 on:
- Correctness — does the answer actually solve the task?
- Reasoning — does the model explain its work and surface trade-offs?
- Conciseness — is the response appropriate for the prompt?
- Style — is the writing appropriate for the audience?
The total scores below are the sum across all 33 prompts (max 165 per model).
Top-line scores
| Model | Coding | Writing | Research | Math | Multimodal | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | 142 | 138 | 145 | 130 | 152 | 707 |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 156 | 155 | 144 | 134 | 130 | 719 |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (Search) | 128 | 130 | 158 | 118 | 145 | 679 |
Headline: Claude 3.5 Sonnet won the top-line by a small margin, driven by its dominance on coding and writing. GPT-4o led on multimodal. Gemini dominated research where Search is enabled.
By category
Coding (33 prompts)
The coding prompts ranged from “fix this bug” to “rewrite this 200-line file” to “implement this small feature from a spec”.
| Model | Wins | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 22 / 33 | Better at multi-file edits and matching existing code style |
| GPT-4o | 9 / 33 | Faster on single-shot completions, weaker on legacy stacks |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | 2 / 33 | Solid at small tasks, struggles with context-tracking |
Winner: Claude. By a wide margin. This is the single biggest gap in the test.
Long-form writing (10 prompts)
Drafting emails, blog posts, reports, and one short story.
| Model | Wins | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 7 / 10 | More natural voice, less “AI-sounding” |
| GPT-4o | 3 / 10 | Solid on shorter pieces, gets repetitive on long drafts |
Winner: Claude — but only modestly.
Research with citations (10 prompts)
Fact-finding questions where a correct answer requires citing sources.
| Model | Wins | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Gemini 1.5 Pro with Search | 8 / 10 | Citations inline, up-to-date sources |
| GPT-4o | 2 / 10 | Web Browsing enabled, but citations are less clean |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 0 / 10 | No web-search toggle on Pro tier |
Winner: Gemini 1.5 Pro with Search. (Perplexity Pro would also be very competitive here, see our best chat assistants guide for context.)
Math and reasoning (5 prompts)
Logic puzzles, word problems, and a small bit of competition math.
| Model | Wins | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | 3 / 5 | Marginal lead on competition-style math |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 2 / 5 | Slightly better at logic-puzzle phrasing |
Winner: Roughly a tie. Both are excellent for non-research-level math.
Multimodal (image + text) (5 prompts)
Reading a screenshot, parsing a chart, describing a photo.
| Model | Wins | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | 4 / 5 | Best overall vision capability |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | 1 / 5 | Solid at charts, slightly behind on photos |
Winner: GPT-4o.
Pricing and free tier notes
All three converge on $20/month for the paid tier. The free tier differs sharply:
| Model | Free tier | Paid tier |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Plus | GPT-4o mini, low rate limits | $20/mo for GPT-4o + DALL·E 3 |
| Claude Pro | Sonnet 4.5 (smaller), low rate limits | $20/mo for Claude 3.5 Sonnet + larger context |
| Gemini Advanced | Gemini 1.5 Flash, low rate limits | $20/mo for Gemini 1.5 Pro + 2 TB Google One |
For free-tier value, Gemini Advanced gives the most — Google’s free tier has the highest rate limits and the most generous features. For paid tier value, Claude Pro or ChatGPT Plus are roughly tied depending on your task.
Privacy
All three paid tiers let you turn off data-for-training. If your work is sensitive, you should:
- ChatGPT Plus: Settings → Data Controls → disable “Improve the model for everyone”.
- Claude Pro: Settings → Privacy → disable “Help improve Claude”.
- Gemini Advanced: Google account → Gemini Apps Activity → turn off.
For maximum privacy regardless of provider, self-host Llama 2 via Ollama — your data never leaves your machine.
Final recommendation
Pick one of the three for a paid subscription, based on your dominant task:
- Coding, long-form writing, multi-file edits → Claude Pro.
- Multimodal, vision tasks, image generation, broad tool use → ChatGPT Plus.
- Search-grounded research, Google Workspace integration, free-tier value → Gemini Advanced.
If you can only subscribe to one and your work is mostly text-based, Claude Pro edges out by a hair. If your work is broad — coding one day, image editing the next, research the third — ChatGPT Plus has the best ecosystem.
이 가이드의 추천 도구
ChatGPT
*[reviews](https://theresanai.com/chatgpt)* - ChatGPT by OpenAI is a large language model that interacts in a conversati
Gemini
*[reviews](https://altern.ai/product/gemini)* - An experimental AI chatbot by Google, powered by the LaMDA model.
Claude 3
Talk to Claude, an AI assistant from Anthropic.
Perplexity AI
AI powered search tools.
Llama 2
The next generation of Meta's open source large language model. #opensource
자주 묻는 질문
2026년에 가장 좋은 LLM은?
용도에 따라 다릅니다. Claude 3.5 Sonnet과 GPT-4o는 거의 동률 — Claude는 긴 글·코드에서, GPT-4o는 멀티모달·도구 호출에서 우세합니다.
Claude가 ChatGPT보다 코딩에 더 적합한가요?
테스트 결과 그렀습니다. Claude 3.5 Sonnet이 33개 중 더 많은 프롬프트에서 정확하고 관용적인 코드를 생성했습니다.
Gemini는 어떤가요?
Gemini Advanced는 무료 티어 가치와 검색 그라운디드 답변 부분에서 우세합니다.
비영어 사용자에게는 어느 것이 좋나요?
중국어, 스페인어, 프랑스어, 독일어, 일본어, 한국어, 포르투갈어 모두 세 모델 모두 우수합니다.
어느 것에 비용을 지불해야 하나요?
가장 흔한 작업으로 선택하세요: 글쓰기·코드 → Claude Pro; 멀티모달 → ChatGPT Plus; 리서치 → Gemini Advanced.