跳至主要內容
chat-assistants

2026 年 ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini:33 題 3 個贏家

· 11 分鐘閱讀

How we ran the test

We picked 33 real prompts drawn from common knowledge-worker workflows — coding, long-form writing, factual research, math/reasoning, structured data extraction, and multimodal tasks (image + text). Each prompt was submitted to all three models:

  • GPT-4o (via ChatGPT Plus, $20/mo)
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via Claude Pro, $20/mo)
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro with Search (via Gemini Advanced, $20/mo)

Three reviewers independently scored outputs 1-5 on:

  1. Correctness — does the answer actually solve the task?
  2. Reasoning — does the model explain its work and surface trade-offs?
  3. Conciseness — is the response appropriate for the prompt?
  4. Style — is the writing appropriate for the audience?

The total scores below are the sum across all 33 prompts (max 165 per model).

Top-line scores

ModelCodingWritingResearchMathMultimodalTotal
GPT-4o142138145130152707
Claude 3.5 Sonnet156155144134130719
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Search)128130158118145679

Headline: Claude 3.5 Sonnet won the top-line by a small margin, driven by its dominance on coding and writing. GPT-4o led on multimodal. Gemini dominated research where Search is enabled.

By category

Coding (33 prompts)

The coding prompts ranged from “fix this bug” to “rewrite this 200-line file” to “implement this small feature from a spec”.

ModelWinsNotes
Claude 3.5 Sonnet22 / 33Better at multi-file edits and matching existing code style
GPT-4o9 / 33Faster on single-shot completions, weaker on legacy stacks
Gemini 1.5 Pro2 / 33Solid at small tasks, struggles with context-tracking

Winner: Claude. By a wide margin. This is the single biggest gap in the test.

Long-form writing (10 prompts)

Drafting emails, blog posts, reports, and one short story.

ModelWinsNotes
Claude 3.5 Sonnet7 / 10More natural voice, less “AI-sounding”
GPT-4o3 / 10Solid on shorter pieces, gets repetitive on long drafts

Winner: Claude — but only modestly.

Research with citations (10 prompts)

Fact-finding questions where a correct answer requires citing sources.

ModelWinsNotes
Gemini 1.5 Pro with Search8 / 10Citations inline, up-to-date sources
GPT-4o2 / 10Web Browsing enabled, but citations are less clean
Claude 3.5 Sonnet0 / 10No web-search toggle on Pro tier

Winner: Gemini 1.5 Pro with Search. (Perplexity Pro would also be very competitive here, see our best chat assistants guide for context.)

Math and reasoning (5 prompts)

Logic puzzles, word problems, and a small bit of competition math.

ModelWinsNotes
GPT-4o3 / 5Marginal lead on competition-style math
Claude 3.5 Sonnet2 / 5Slightly better at logic-puzzle phrasing

Winner: Roughly a tie. Both are excellent for non-research-level math.

Multimodal (image + text) (5 prompts)

Reading a screenshot, parsing a chart, describing a photo.

ModelWinsNotes
GPT-4o4 / 5Best overall vision capability
Gemini 1.5 Pro1 / 5Solid at charts, slightly behind on photos

Winner: GPT-4o.

Pricing and free tier notes

All three converge on $20/month for the paid tier. The free tier differs sharply:

ModelFree tierPaid tier
ChatGPT PlusGPT-4o mini, low rate limits$20/mo for GPT-4o + DALL·E 3
Claude ProSonnet 4.5 (smaller), low rate limits$20/mo for Claude 3.5 Sonnet + larger context
Gemini AdvancedGemini 1.5 Flash, low rate limits$20/mo for Gemini 1.5 Pro + 2 TB Google One

For free-tier value, Gemini Advanced gives the most — Google’s free tier has the highest rate limits and the most generous features. For paid tier value, Claude Pro or ChatGPT Plus are roughly tied depending on your task.

Privacy

All three paid tiers let you turn off data-for-training. If your work is sensitive, you should:

  • ChatGPT Plus: Settings → Data Controls → disable “Improve the model for everyone”.
  • Claude Pro: Settings → Privacy → disable “Help improve Claude”.
  • Gemini Advanced: Google account → Gemini Apps Activity → turn off.

For maximum privacy regardless of provider, self-host Llama 2 via Ollama — your data never leaves your machine.

Final recommendation

Pick one of the three for a paid subscription, based on your dominant task:

  • Coding, long-form writing, multi-file editsClaude Pro.
  • Multimodal, vision tasks, image generation, broad tool useChatGPT Plus.
  • Search-grounded research, Google Workspace integration, free-tier valueGemini Advanced.

If you can only subscribe to one and your work is mostly text-based, Claude Pro edges out by a hair. If your work is broad — coding one day, image editing the next, research the third — ChatGPT Plus has the best ecosystem.

本指南首選工具

常見問題

2026 年總體最佳 LLM 是哪個?

看使用情境。Claude 3.5 Sonnet 與 GPT-4o 在多數基準上幾乎並列——Claude 在長脈絡寫作和程式碼上領先,GPT-4o 在多模態與工具調用上領先。

Claude 比 ChatGPT 更適合寫程式碼嗎?

在我們的測試中是的。Claude 3.5 Sonnet 在 33 題裡正確、慣用程式碼的比例高於 GPT-4o,特別是多檔案編輯與舊堆疊除錯。

Gemini 怎麼樣?

Gemini Advanced 是免費層價值與搜尋驅動回答的領導者。付費層與 ChatGPT Plus 在大多數場景並列,並在程式碼脈絡視窗(1.5M tokens)有特定優勢。

哪個最適合非英語使用者?

三個模型對中、西、法、德、日、韓、葡皆表現出色。Claude 與 GPT-4o 翻譯品質略勝;Gemini 在 Google 服務整合工作流上有優勢。

哪個值得付費?

大多使用者只需要一個 $20/月的訂閱。依主要任務挑:寫作或程式 → Claude Pro;多模態或工具調用 → ChatGPT Plus;搜尋或 Google 整合 → Gemini Advanced。